Would it be difficult to convert?
This very much depends on how powerful you want the resulting website to be. Are you looking at simply preventing duplication of HTML/logic or would you rather have a full database-driven CMS?
A version of what you already have with includes would mean you have a
PHP file instead of every
HTML file and all the
PHP files include separate files for the header, navigation, footer, etc. If you want to change your left or right columns, you just change one file. You can even normally get away with changing your design significantly and not changing all of your
PHP files. The downside? You have a
PHP file for each piece of content. If you have 100 pages now, and will have 200 next year and 400 the year after then you're looking at a file management nightmare and maybe a
CMS system (with content stored in the database) would be better? Obviously converting to a
CMS will probably be more difficult than a simple include-driven website. But a
CMS gives you many more options and is more future-proof.
Is it worth converting?
Anything is better than your current set up!
Is it worth converting the whole site?, or should i just do certain parts?
I'd do it all. It's more complete. And if you only do parts, then you not only have lots of updates to do, but lots of different kinds of updates too.
Search engine ranking, filenames, spiders and bots
You don't have to change anything. Going to a
CMS will make it harder to keep your old filenames the same - it's better to just setup redirects from the old filenames to the new
URL. There's no reason why Images should change. Search engines and spiders will see no difference if you redirect old pages to new URLs and the content is the same - why would they see a difference? You can even use a .htaccess file so that a request to an old page/image will serve up a new one.
Out of all of this, I think the real question is how much work do you want to do? A
CMS is going to cost you more time and involvement, but once it's setup it'll save you the most time overall.
PHP includes will be much faster to set up, but could hold you back in future. We can easily answer any other questions you have.
QUOTE(benbramz @ Aug 17 2007, 07:44 AM) Ive noticed that quite a few people are now adding quotes from the board into their signature. I think its started an new web-radiance craze.. :P